Corporate disputes in Thailand arise in various contexts, including disagreements among shareholders, conflicts between directors and management, breach of fiduciary duties, misuse of company assets, or challenges to corporate resolutions. Such disputes can significantly disrupt business operations and undermine investor confidence. Navigating corporate disputes in Thailand requires a firm grasp of company law, litigation and arbitration procedures, and regulatory obligations.
This article provides an in-depth examination of the legal framework, common types of corporate disputes, remedies available, dispute resolution mechanisms, and practical considerations for handling corporate conflicts in Thailand.
Legal Framework
Corporate disputes in Thailand are primarily governed by:
-
Civil and Commercial Code (CCC) — particularly Book III, Title XXII (Partnerships and Companies).
-
Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (1992) — applicable to public companies.
-
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) — in cases involving listed companies and securities violations.
-
Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002) — where disputes are subject to arbitration.
-
Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017) — in disputes with competition law dimensions.
Common Types of Corporate Disputes
1️⃣ Shareholder Disputes
-
Disagreements over company direction, dividend policy, or major transactions.
-
Oppression of minority shareholders (e.g., exclusion from decision-making, unfair dilution).
-
Disputes over share transfers or pre-emption rights.
2️⃣ Director and Management Disputes
-
Allegations of breach of fiduciary duties, gross negligence, or mismanagement.
-
Unauthorized transactions or decisions exceeding board authority.
-
Disputes over appointment or removal of directors.
3️⃣ Corporate Governance Disputes
-
Challenges to the validity of shareholder or board resolutions.
-
Conflicts over compliance with company articles or shareholder agreements.
-
Disputes involving improper notice, quorum, or voting procedures at meetings.
4️⃣ Misappropriation and Fraud
-
Alleged embezzlement or diversion of corporate assets.
-
Unauthorized use of company funds for personal benefit.
5️⃣ Deadlock in Joint Ventures
-
50:50 joint ventures with no mechanism for resolving impasses on major decisions.
Remedies Available
Parties to a corporate dispute in Thailand may seek:
✅ Court injunctions to prevent improper action or enforce compliance with company law or the articles.
✅ Nullification of resolutions improperly passed at shareholder or board meetings.
✅ Damages against directors or officers for breach of duty.
✅ Orders for account or restitution of misappropriated assets.
✅ Winding up of the company where the business cannot be carried on in accordance with the law or articles.
Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
A. Litigation
-
Corporate disputes are generally heard in the Civil Court or IP&IT Court if cross-border or IP-related issues arise.
-
Cases involving public companies or listed companies may also engage the Administrative Court or the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), depending on the nature of the dispute.
B. Arbitration
-
Increasingly common, especially in joint venture and shareholder agreements involving foreign investors.
-
Thai courts will stay proceedings if a valid arbitration clause covers the dispute.
C. Mediation
-
Courts often encourage mediation, either pre-litigation or during trial.
Procedural Steps in Corporate Litigation
1️⃣ Filing of complaint
-
The aggrieved party files a statement of claim in the appropriate court.
2️⃣ Service of process
-
The defendant is served and required to file a defense (typically within 15 days if domiciled in Thailand).
3️⃣ Preliminary hearing
-
The court may order a preliminary hearing to define issues and consider provisional measures.
4️⃣ Trial
-
Documentary evidence (e.g., minutes, contracts, financial records) is central.
-
Witness testimony (including expert witnesses) may be required.
5️⃣ Judgment
-
Courts may issue injunctions, declare resolutions void, award damages, or grant other remedies as appropriate.
Key Legal Considerations
Fiduciary Duties
Directors of Thai companies owe duties of care and loyalty:
-
Act in good faith and in the company’s best interests.
-
Avoid conflicts of interest.
-
Comply with the law, the company’s objectives, and the articles.
Breach of duty can result in personal liability to the company or shareholders.
Minority Shareholder Protections
Thai law provides some safeguards for minority shareholders:
-
Right to request a court order to nullify resolutions contrary to law or the articles (Section 1195 CCC for private companies; Sections 69–70 of the Public Limited Companies Act for public companies).
-
Right to seek winding up if the company cannot continue its business lawfully or in line with its objectives (Section 1237(4) CCC).
Corporate Deadlock
In deadlock situations:
-
Shareholder agreements may include deadlock resolution mechanisms (e.g., buy-sell clauses, put/call options).
-
Absent such provisions, court winding-up is sometimes the only remedy.
Oppression of Minority
Where majority shareholders act in a manner unfairly prejudicial to minority interests, remedies may include:
-
Court-ordered regulation of future conduct.
-
Setting aside improper resolutions.
-
Damages or restitution.
Evidentiary Issues
-
Corporate records (minutes, share registers, board resolutions) are critical.
-
Financial statements and audit reports provide supporting evidence.
-
Witnesses include directors, officers, and professional advisors (e.g., accountants).
Enforcement of Judgments
-
Thai judgments are enforced via the Legal Execution Department, using measures such as:
-
Asset seizure.
-
Garnishment of bank accounts.
-
Registration of judgments to affect corporate registries.
-
-
Foreign judgments are not directly enforceable in Thailand, but may form the basis of a new lawsuit.
Common Practical Challenges
⚠ Document control
-
Majority shareholders or management may control records, making evidence gathering difficult for minority claimants.
⚠ Delays
-
Complex cases may take years, especially if appeals are pursued.
⚠ Enforcement difficulties
-
Defendants may dissipate or conceal assets pending litigation outcome.
⚠ Cultural considerations
-
Corporate disputes in family-owned or closely held companies often carry personal as well as business dimensions.
Example Scenario
👉 A minority shareholder in a Thai private limited company alleges that the majority shareholders passed a resolution to issue new shares at an unfairly low price, diluting the minority’s interest. The minority shareholder files a complaint to nullify the resolution under Section 1195 CCC, seeking an injunction to prevent registration of the new shares and damages for loss of value.
Preventive Measures
While this article focuses on disputes, prevention is always preferable:
-
Clear shareholder agreements with dispute resolution mechanisms.
-
Defined roles, authority limits, and procedures in company articles.
-
Regular and transparent reporting to all shareholders.
Conclusion
Corporate disputes in Thailand span a wide range of issues and can pose significant risks to business continuity and value. A deep understanding of company law, court procedures, and practical enforcement realities is essential for both prevention and effective resolution. Parties should approach corporate disputes strategically, with proper documentation, legal counsel, and, where possible, preventive contractual safeguards.